A little while ago, I was a volunteer shopper for Code 3/Clothe the Kids (third year for me). This is a local charity that exists because of the combined efforts of the KPD, the KFD, the Kiwanis, and others. Disadvantaged kids are taken shopping for clothes by volunteer adults, who have a predetermined budget. The purpose is to ensure that the kids have some decent outfits without being subject to undue parental influence.
That latter requirement became clear in years past; originally, some parents would take the kids’ clothes, get a refund, and turn around and spend the money on cigarettes and booze (true story). The system is considerably less exploitable now, but attempts to work around the limits still get made, every year.
This year, “my” kid was a boy of about eight. It started off well; he seemed amiable and not particularly shy, and picked out some shirts, undies, shoes, and other necessities. Then came the moment all the kids love: The troll down the toy aisle.
The rules are fairly clear. The majority of the budget is to be spent on clothing, with only ten to fifteen dollars or so spent on the gewgaws. “My” kid, who seemed at first to have such a good operational grasp of the procedure, quickly lost track of what we were doing.
He wanted a Nerf dart gun, one of the high-end ones that ran about $40. Well, no, too expensive. All right then, how about this MP3 player? $30. No, sorry, still over the budget. Okay, well, here’s a radio-controlled Humvee. $40, and we’re back up to way over the line.
Back to the electronics, where he confided that his dad had asked that he pick up a CD boombox for his and his sister’s bedroom. In addition to the cost — yes, again over the allowance — it became clear that he was now operating under a parent’s instruction, which is a no-no for the shopping day.
I worked with him a little about budgets, explaining that the toy allowance was only so large. He could have one thing that was just that large, or two smaller things that, added together, were that large; or three littler things that added up, and so on. Explained in those terms, he seemed to get what I was saying, and made a counter-offer: If we put back some of the clothes, can we get the radio or the Humvee then?
Clever lad. He lacked foresight, but he understood the idea of bargaining.
